Chief Dental Officer Barry Cockroft denying even the most basic facts about amalgam poisoning:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/seriously_misleading_falsehoods
"Distinguished expert" Allister Vale unable to defend his prescribing of two tests well-known to be useless quackery:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/why_swbhnhst_uses_well_known_use
Whopping falsehood from BSMHFT akin to "birds are highly unlikely to have wings":
www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/why_chronic_mercury_poisoning_is
Whopping falsehood that dentists have competence in mercury diagnosis whereas GPs don't:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/dentist_training_in_diagnosis_of
Link to scan of the Chief Exec Denise McLellan's letter affirming that ridiculous falsehood and also deceitfully slimily labelling Dr Gini's TELLING me to go to a dentist as "refer" to a dentist, when the one thing I could never get any of these GPs to do was actually provide exactly that, a referral to a dentist. See also FoI to Univ of Bham confirming that their dental students do indeed have no training in mercury diagnosis.
Department of "Health" defend their lies about amalgam by quoting from supposedly World Health Organisation 2009 report, while failing to mention it was disowned by WHO eight months earlier for being fraudulent deceit.
http://amalgamlegal.blogspot.com/
NHS avoidance of use of the cheap easy and instant mercury vapour measurements to determine the intake of toxin.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/your_avoidance_of_use_of_mercury/new
And there's a lot more I've found out.
(This page can be reached by typing www.bit.ly/foihg, that is as in FoI and Hg (chemical symbol of mercury).)
High Court clinical negligence claim against Dept of "Health" for decades of disability caused by false claims of harmlessness of dental amalgam. Well, actually it turns out that high court judges talk the same level of indefensible claptrap as the NHS's "experts" do. Any other profession deploying absolute zero logic and honesty would be sacked instantly. Gas fitters have to score 100% in their regular exams, but judges and nhs "experts" can safely get away with 0%.